A coalition of cyber activists and advocacy groups from 42 countries on Monday released a letter defending encryption and calling on governments to end efforts at undermining such digital privacy tools.
“Encryption tools, technologies, and services are essential to protect against harm and to shield our digital infrastructure and personal communications from unauthorized access,” reads the letter, a project of digital rights group Access Now and signed by organizations such as the ACLU, Amnesty International, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Human Rights Watch, and La Quadrature du Net, among nearly 200 others.
“As we move toward connecting the next billion users, restrictions on encryption in any country will likely have global impact,” the letter continues. “Encryption and other anonymizing tools and technologies enable lawyers, journalists, whistleblowers, and organizers to communicate freely across borders and to work to better their communities. It also assures users of the integrity of their data and authenticates individuals to companies, governments, and one another.”
U.S. officials have increasingly urged tech companies to create “backdoors” to encrypted communications as an aid to law enforcement investigating alleged terrorist activity. But many of those companies’ high-profile executives, such as Apple’s Tim Cook, have resisted the call, warning that reducing encryption safeguards threatens users’ safety online by making them vulnerable to third-party hackers.
And human rights leaders, such as United Nations special rapporteur for freedom of expression David Kaye, who also signed the letter, have said that privacy is a human right.
“Encryption and anonymity, and the security concepts behind them, provide the privacy and security necessary for the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in the digital age,” Kaye said in a press release accompanying the letter.
Last week, top U.S. officials met with tech leaders in a private summit in San Jose, California, with news reports circulating copies of a vague agenda for the meeting that read in part, “How can we make it harder for terrorists to use the internet to mobilize, facilitate, and operationalize attacks, and make it easier for law enforcement and the intelligence community to identify terrorist operatives and prevent attacks?”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT