Month: November 2020

Klopp names managerial idol who ‘completely changed’ the game

Jurgen Klopp has hailed Italian coaching legend Arrigo Sacchi for transforming how football is played.

The coaching influences behind Klopp’s managerial rise have been discussed in depth before, with former assistant Peter Krawietz naming Wolfgang Frank as his icon.

Frank, who was in charge of Mainz as Klopp was transitioning from player to coach, followed many of Sacchi’s teachings which can still be seen at Liverpool to this day, such as the high defensive line.

As part of his upcoming book, The Greatest Games, Jamie Carragher spoke with the Reds manager about Sacchi and his Milan side, as serialised in part by the Daily Telegraph.

“Sacchi completely changed how we think about football,” said Klopp. “He is one of the most influential coaches in the history of the game and a complete game-changer for me.

“Because of him we had to judge the size of the pitch in a new way. I am sure you remember playing with man-marking tactics where you pretty much followed the opponent you were marking to the toilet. The pitch always felt incredibly big. Nobody played a high line because many teams played the libero.

“Before him I was told who to mark and that was it. Too often the team with the better individuals won the game because it was all one-versus-one challenges all over the pitch, so if the other player was better than you, how could you win? Sacchi’s organisation made it completely different.

“I did not learn it from Sacchi, but it was my manager at Mainz, Wolfgang Frank, who brought it to us, which meant as a player I watched five hundred videos of AC Milan.

“I saw how whenever Franco Baresi raised his arms to play offside, everyone else in the team was waiting. Ball orientated defending became a real tool, and of course on top of that Milan were a sensational team with Ruud Gullit, Marco van Basten and Baresi. They were some of the best players ever.”

Click Here: crusaders rugby jerseys

The love is mutual.

 

Keane destroys ‘overweight’ Manchester City star for ‘issue’

Roy Keane has accused Sergio Aguero of “piling on the pounds” during his recovery from injury.

Click Here: crusaders rugby jerseys

Aguero was not named in the Manchester City squad that faced Liverpool on Sunday, with Gabriel Jesus impressing in his stead.

The 32-year-old has struggled with injury issues again this season, recovering from a knee issue only to suffer a hamstring problem soon after.

READ MORE: 16 Conclusions on Manchester City 1-1 Liverpool

He has not completed more than 75 minutes of a game since March and is in the final months of his contract at City, with an eventual return to South America having long been planned.

Keane laid into the slipping physical standards of the forward, which might have contributed to some of his injury lay-off.

“My issue with Aguero when he came back was he looked overweight,” he told Sky Sports.

“God knows what size shorts he was wearing. He did look really heavy.

“Sometimes you can be out injured and hit the ground running. It’s difficult to get up to speed, but don’t be piling on the pounds.

“This idea that players need two or three months to get up to speed. I was worried when he came back he looked really, really heavy.”

Aguero attracted controversy last month after an incident involving assistant referee Sian Massey-Ellis, with Guardiola defending him as “the nicest person”.

“Look for problems in other situations, not in this one,” he added, so Keane is essentially just obliging and Guardiola was asking for this in the first place.

 

On Syria, Putin's Anti-War Case Outshines Obama's Call for Bombs

According to Russian President Vladimir Putin, those who consider the United States of America “exceptional” above other countries—including President Obama—represent an “extremely dangerous” mindset when it comes to international relations and global peace.

Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey

The closing salvo in a sharply worded, yet conciliatory, open letter to the American people in the form of a New York Times op-ed on Thursday, Putin suggests that amid the ongoing crisis in Syria the U.S. should maintain its leadership role in the world, but drop its claim to ultimate superiority.

Though new diplomatic efforts are underway at the United Nations over Syria’s civil war, with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry set to begin two-day talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Geneva on Thursday—a comparison of Putin’s op-ed with Obama’s televised address on Tuesday reveals an ironic twist for some observers who note that the former KGB official and noted authoritarian is running circles around the Nobel Peace Prize laureate when it comes to promoting a settlement in the region that doesn’t include cruise missile strikes or a bombing campaign.

Putin’s op-ed—an attempt “to speak directly to the American people and their political leaders,” he says—argues that the world must respect the structures established by the creation of the United Nations if it wants to avoid the horrific consequences that could be unleashed if the U.S. decides to strike Syria without sanction by the international community. He writes:

In contrast, many observers took Obama’s Tuesday night speech as a continued assault against international law when he indicated that he alone could still order a war against Syria.

Declaring he still “possessed the authority to order military strikes,” Obama also said that U.S. forces will remain on standby “if diplomacy fails.”

But, regarding his claim to have “authority” to attack Syria without international or Congressional approval, The Progressive’s Matthew Rothschild called the president’s assertion “ludicrous,” writing:

In a more general statement against Obama’s push for war, Putin took the opportunity to “disagree” with Obama’s declaration of the well-worn notion of “American exceptionalism.”

In his address on Tuesday, Obama told the nation, “My fellow Americans, for nearly seven decades, the United States has been the anchor of global security. This has meant doing more than forging international agreements — it has meant enforcing them. The burdens of leadership are often heavy, but the world is a better place because we have borne them.”

Later—calling the elevated status an “essential truth”—Obama said it was because America is “exceptional” that it might be compelled to attack Syria.

Critics, however, slammed the idea.

By expressing that sentiment, argues Common Dreams contributor Pat Lamarche, “the president rolled the clock back to 1943, claiming in that particular lifetime of U.S. actions on global security, our killings have been more righteous and had better outcomes than the anticipated actions of others. And with this distorted view of the consequences, President Obama hopes once again to use bombs to set things right.”

Also writing at Common Dreams, Johnny Barber, currently in Afghanistan as a member of a delegation from Voices for Creative Non-Violence, countered Obama’s remarks by saying, “With humility and resolve Americans should deal honestly with our past, with our present, and with our dire future. With modest effort and risk we can make the future safer for all children. We can do this by simply demanding accountability of our leaders and recognizing the only thing that is exceptional about America is our inability to see other’s lives as valuable as our own.”

And Putin’s direct challenge to the idea:

And though none of this touches on the inequities and injustices found readily within Russian society—where ideas of democracy and equality under the law remain under siege—Putin’s compelling narrative against U.S. aggression in Syria is worth quoting at length:

As professor of anthropology and Huffington Post contributor Marc Lamont Hill tweeted:

And:

And Dan Kennedy, journalism professor at Northwestern University, tweeted:

_______________________________________