Skip to content
The growing number of indiscriminate bombings in three of the most devastating military conflicts currently underway -– in Syria, Afghanistan and Yemen – are taking a heavy toll on medical personnel serving with humanitarian organizations — along with thousands of civilians caught in the crossfire between government forces and rebel groups.
The U.S. bombing of a hospital run by Doctors Without Borders in Kunduz, Afghanistan last October, and the Syrian government’s attacks on doctors and medical facilities, have been singled out as just two examples of the dangerous environments under which health care workers operate.
The attacks have also prevented medical care being provided to populations in need—and largely under siege.
When medical staff are killed in these attacks, the many lives that could be saved are also jeopardized, according to experts from Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), Doctors Without Borders, and the Open Society Foundation.
Click Here: Rugby league Jerseys
Speaking at a panel discussion this week, some of the experts said when combatants destroy a hospital, thousands of people who are sick and wounded, are left with nowhere to go.
Asked if these attacks are by design or by accident, Elise Baker, program associate at Physicians for Human Rights, told IPS the five-year-old conflict in Syria has been marked by government forces orchestrating a deliberate campaign to destroy the health care infrastructure and attack medical personnel in opposition-controlled areas.
“This is just one element of a campaign against civilians which is in direct violation of the key principle of distinction in the laws of war which makes it unlawful to ever target civilians or civilian objects such as hospitals and schools”.
She said additional evidence of attacks on health care facilities as being part of a campaign is that humanitarian aid, including medical supplies and medicines, have largely been distributed through Damascus.
Government forces have obstructed the delivery of these and other life-saving supplies to opposition-held areas or only let convoys through after stripping out medical supplies.
Baker said PHR’s map documenting the attacks on hospitals does not include strikes “that we believe were accidental or – to use the parlance of humanitarian law, a result of collateral damage.”
“PHR is deeply concerned about the reports of attacks on hospitals in Yemen.”
However, she said, it is unclear at this point whether the Saudi-led coalition is targeting hospitals or if hospitals are being hit as the coalition members carpet bomb areas in an indiscriminate manner, and in turn, hospitals, like civilians and civilian objects, are paying the price.
According to PHR’s data, 2015 marked the worst year on record for attacks on medical facilities in Syria, with government forces responsible for most of the more than 100 attacks.
Between March 2011 and November 2015, there were 336 attacks on 240 medical facilities in Syria, 90 percent of them committed by Syria and its allied forces.
In the same time period, 697 medical personnel were killed, with Syria and its allies responsible for 95 percent of the deaths.
PHR tracks these findings in an interactive map, which includes photographic and video documentation of these crimes. In November, PHR released a report detailing the Syrian government’s attacks on health care, “Aleppo Abandoned: A Case Study on Health Care in Syria.”
Asked about a letter from the Saudi government urging UN and international aid agencies to leave areas controlled by the Houthi rebel forces in Yemen to facilitate bombings, UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric confirmed receipt of the letter.
“Yes, there’s been an exchange of letters between the Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia and our colleagues at the Office of Humanitarian Affairs,” he said.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“What I can tell you is that the United Nations continues to call on all parties to allow access for humanitarian workers wherever they are needed to be, that access needs to be free and unfettered for humanitarian workers and, obviously, humanitarian goods.”
“And it is also important to note that all the parties involved in this conflict and any conflict need to make sure they do their utmost to protect those humanitarian workers,” Dujarric told reporters Thursday.
Asked whether the clearance sought was only around military installations, Dujarric said: “I think the only premise that we accept is that humanitarian workers need to have free and unfettered access to all the areas where they need to be, and it is incumbent on all the parties to ensure that they protect those humanitarian workers.”
Baker told IPS it is unlawful for warring parties to use indiscriminate weapons in civilian areas.
It violates the other key principle of the laws of war which is that any attacks must be proportionate, and to the extent that there are concerns about harm to civilians, the military benefit must outweigh the potential harm to civilians.
“Clearly, this principle is not being applied in Yemen,” she said.
Asked what action the UN should take, Baker told IPS: First, the UN Security Council should condemn all these violations in the strongest possible terms. Allowing them to continue undermines decades of work establishing these norms that were aimed at making war a little less hellish for civilians.
Second, the UN Security Council has the power to refer situations in which these crimes are occurring to the International Criminal Court – but as we have seen, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council effectively are content to live with a stalemate.
In the case of Syria, she pointed out, Russia and China are refusing to allow stronger action, and in the case of Yemen, the US, UK and France support the Saudi-led coalition.
“As a result, the UN Security Council, which is charged with maintaining international peace and security, has failed miserably, and it is civilians in Syria and Yemen and elsewhere who are paying the price – often with their lives”, Baker added.
She said PHR has documented numerous incidents where Syrian government forces have attacked the same hospital repeatedly in a short period of time or have attacked numerous hospitals in a small geographic area within a short period of time.
These attacks clearly indicate the Syrian government’s intent to destroy health care systems inside opposition-controlled Syria. Two particularly compelling examples are included below.
PHR has documented seven attacks on M10 hospital, Aleppo city’s main trauma hospital. Four of these attacked happened within the 10-day period between June 23 and July 3, 2014.
The two most recent attacks occurred on April 28 and April 29, 2015. This hospital was established before the conflict started. It is not in a hidden location, she noted.
On August 7, 2015, between 10am and 1pm, Syrian government forces bombed five hospitals in Idlib governorate. The following day, they hit another hospital in Idlib.
Two days later on August 10, government forces hit three more hospitals in Idlib. All nine hospitals attacked in that four-day period were within 30 miles of each other.
All were at least six miles from the nearest frontline, and none were near military locations. All were attacked with discriminate weaponry. Five of the nine hospitals had been attacked previously by Syrian government forces.
© 2019 Inter Press Service
Norway’s chapter of the freedom of expression organization PEN on Monday announced it would award its Ossietzky Prize to whistleblower Edward Snowden for his role in exposing mass surveillance—and challenged the Norwegian government to allow him to come to Oslo to accept it without fear of extradition.
“It is high time for a political initiative to challenge the threats towards the prizewinner, an initiative that should conclude with an offer of stay and protection,” the organization wrote in its press release announcing the prize. “A suitable start of such a process would be for the Norwegian government to guarantee him safe passage to receive the Ossietzky Prize for 2016.”
Snowden faces espionage charges in the U.S. for his 2013 disclosure of the National Security Agency’s (NSA) unlawful mass surveillance of its citizens and foreign allies. Although the European Parliament in 2015 recognized his status as a defender of human rights and urged member states to grant him asylum, none of the countries in the European Union have heeded the call.
Norsk PEN’s challenge to the government is the second time in as many years that a literary human rights organization in Norway called on its leaders to guarantee Snowden’s freedom to collect a freedom of expression prize in person.
As the English-language Norwegian publication News in English reports:
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
At the time, the government said it could not guarantee Snowden’s freedom due to the EU’s extradition treaty with the U.S., which is also Norway’s most important ally, News in English wrote. But this year, circumstances have changed, as Norsk PEN leader William Nygaard—a Norwegian icon of freedom of expression—has explicitly joined the call.
Nygaard, a former book publisher, survived an assassination attempt in 1993 stemming from his company’s publication of Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses.
“Norwegian authorities must secure that [Snowden] can obtain travel documents and a guarantee for free movement,” he told the newspaper Dagsavisen on Tuesday. “For us, it’s important that we put the spotlight on the Snowden case with him here to develop the debate over limits on national and international surveillance.”
The prestigious prize is named after Carl von Ossietzky, a German newspaper editor and pacifist, who in 1931 revealed Germany’s secret re-armament operations in violation of the Versailles Treaty. Ossietzky was arrested by Nazis two years later and imprisoned in concentration camps. In 1935, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, but was refused permission by German authorities to leave to Norway to collect the award. He died of tuberculosis in a prison hospital in 1938.
News in English quoted a column published Tuesday by Norwegian newspaper editor Harald Stranghelle which stated that it’s time for officials to “stand up for the rights we love to view as our fundamental values.”
The government “can’t close its eyes [again] and pretend this isn’t up for them to decide,” Stranghelle wrote. “That’s cowardly, and can be understandable, but the price of holding the world’s most important whistleblower at arm’s length is being robbed of all credibility in our time’s most important debate over rights.”
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019
Click:Georgia Bulldogs Football Jersey
Hundreds of protesters in Bangladesh on Thursday launched a 400 kilometer (248 mile) march in opposition to the government’s plans to build two coal-powered plants near the world’s largest mangrove forest region on the border between Bangladesh and India.
Work has already begun on the $1.7 billion venture, but protesters fear that pollution from the plants would destroy the forests, known as the Sundarbans, which are home to a range of species—including Bengal tigers—and are collectively a UNESCO World Heritage site.
“It’s now or never. We can’t allow this power plant to destroy the world’s largest mangrove forest,” Ruhin Hossain, one of the march organizers told Agence France-Presse.
The New Indian Express reports:
According to Al Jazeera, the 1,320-megawatt plant already built by the Indian and Bangladeshi governments and a 545-megawatt facility planned for construction by the U.S.-based energy firm Orion are necessary to provide electricity to roughly a third of the population that currently does not have access to power.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
However, the opponents say the venture would destroy a critical ecosystem that is already weakened by pollution and overpopulation. In 2014, the forests were the site of a “catastrophic” oil spill that raised fears of long-lasting ecological damage when an empty vessel struck a tanker carrying about 92,500 gallons of oil.
The Sundarbans have “saved us from cyclones, flash floods and it’s our biggest protection against tsunamis,” Hossain told AFP.
Anu Mohamad, the committee’s member secretary, said last week, “No sensible person will deny that there are many alternative ways for electricity generation. But there is no alternative for [the] Sundarbans.”
Roughly 1,000 climate activists, students, and others rallied in the Bangladeshi capital of Dhaka before embarking on the march.
Al Jazeera reports that at least part of the journey will take place on a bus as the activists travel from town to town to spread awareness and gather additional protesters.
“The Sundarbans is one of the pristine beauties of the world,” Hossain said.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store
Human rights groups said the Pentagon’s disciplinary actions against U.S. military personnel for the October bombing of a Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan were both “an injustice and an insult.”
The Department of Defense announced late Wednesday it would issue “administrative punishments” against 12 service members responsible for the disastrous bombing that resulted in the deaths of 42 patients and staff—but would not file any criminal charges.
“For good reason the victims’ family members will see this as both an injustice and an insult: the US military investigated itself and decided no crimes had been committed,” wrote Patricia Grossman, senior Afghanistan researcher at Human Rights Watch (HRW), in a blog post on Thursday. “The failure to criminally investigate senior officials liable for the attack is not only an affront to the lives lost at the MSF hospital, but a blow against the rule of law in Afghanistan and elsewhere.”
MSF, which has called for an independent investigation into the bombing, said it would request more details from the U.S. government before commenting on the disciplinary actions.
The medical charity has said the bombing may amount to a war crime and has denounced previous actions by the U.S. government, such as handing out “condolence payments,” that it said were insufficient.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
As Grossman pointed out, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter responded to the bombing by promising to conduct a “full and transparent” investigation into the attack and hold people accountable. “Apparently that has not happened,” Grossman wrote.
Saeed Haqyar, a Kunduz resident whose uncle was killed in the bombing, told Agence France-Presse Friday, “The [U.S.] punishment is a joke. This inhuman, barbaric crime has pushed bereaved family members to the point of insanity.”
Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership
The Pentagon is due next week to publish its own report on the attack, although classified material will be redacted.
MSF continues to call for a full and independent investigation.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Puerto Rico asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday for permission to restructure the debt of its financially struggling public utilities under a court-supervised regime similar to Chapter 9 bankruptcy laws used by U.S. cities such as Detroit and Stockton, California.
In addition to potentially giving the commonwealth a better chance at repaying some of its $70 billion debt, the case “tests, at a fundamental level, how much authority the island of more than 3.5 million people has to manage its own governmental affairs,” Lyle Denniston wrote at SCOTUSblog last week.
“And lurking just beneath the surface,” he continued, “is the broader question of whether it is unconstitutional to treat Puerto Rico differently than the fifty state governments on the mainland and in Alaska and Hawaii.”
What’s more, the case could chip away at hedge funds’ stranglehold on the island. As journalist David Dayen wrote for the Winter 2016 issue of The American Prospect: “Puerto Rico is just the latest battlefield for a phalanx of hedge funds called ‘vultures,’ which pick at the withered sinews of troubled governments. In Greece, Argentina, Detroit, and now Puerto Rico, vultures have bought distressed debt on the cheap, and then used coercion, threats, and legal action to secure a massive windfall, compounding the effects on millions of citizens.”
Reuters reports Tuesday:
According to the Associated Press, “four liberal justices on a short-handed Supreme Court seemed sympathetic” to Puerto Rico’s argument on Tuesday. Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. has recused himself from the case and the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat remains vacant.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Bloomberg added:
If the outcome is favorable for Puerto Rico, “we’ll have some additional tools to address some of the debt in an orderly way,” said Eric LeCompte, a United Nations sovereign debt expert and executive director of the religious development group Jubilee USA, on Tuesday.
Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina
However, LeCompte added, “while this could be positive, it still doesn’t offer a comprehensive solution” because it addresses only one portion of the island nation’s ballooning financial obligations.
Jubilee USA has described the situation in Puerto Rico as a “humanitarian crisis” and opposes further austerity or cuts to help pay down the territory’s debt. To that end, thousands of college students from the University of Puerto Rico approved a three-day, full-campus shutdown last week to protest recent austerity measures.
A solidarity protest against colonialism and capitalism took place Tuesday in New York City.
In testimony (pdf) to Congress last month, LeCompte appealed for lawmakers to support “reforms that ensure Puerto Rico’s economy serves its people, debt restructuring to allows for economic growth, and accountability measures to stave off corruption.”
Meanwhile, House Speaker Paul Ryan told reporters on Tuesday that the House Natural Resources Committee was “closing in” on a final Puerto Rico relief bill, according to The Hill. The committee is expected to hold a hearing on the draft legislation on April 13 with a markup the following day, according to a House Democratic leadership aide.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Citing the need for “urgency” and “big ideas” to take on dueling threats to democracy and the planet, Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon broke with his Democratic colleagues and became the first U.S. Senator to endorse Bernie Sanders for president.
Despite the “uphill battle ahead,” Sanders’ “leadership…and willingness to fearlessly stand up to the powers that be have galvanized a grass-roots movement,” wrote Merkley, announcing his endorsement Wednesday in a New York Times op-ed. “People know that we don’t just need better policies, we need a wholesale rethinking of how our economy and our politics work, and for whom they work.”
Merkley explained how growing up in “working-class Oregon,” his single-income household was able to lead a middle-class life: “buy a home, take a vacation and help pay for college.”
Now, living in that very same community, Merkley says that “the outlook for the kids growing up there is a lot gloomier today.”
“Many middle-class Americans are working longer for less income than decades ago, even while big-ticket expenses like housing, health care and college have relentlessly pushed higher,” he writes.
“It is not that America is less wealthy than 40 years ago—quite the contrary,” he says, adding that the problem is that the economy “both by accident and design, has become rigged to make a fortunate few very well off while leaving most Americans struggling to keep up.”
At the same time, Merkley continues, political power has also become more concentrated as “special interests, aided by their political and judicial allies, have exercised an ever-tighter grip on our political system, from the rise of unlimited, secret campaign spending to a voter suppression movement.”
“We need urgency. We need big ideas. We need to rethink the status quo,” he states.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Merkley acknowledges the “remarkable record” of former senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, adding that “she would be a strong and capable president.”
“But Bernie Sanders,” he writes, “is boldly and fiercely addressing the biggest challenges facing our country.”
From his committed opposition to trade deals, Wall Street greed, and corrupt campaign finance laws to Sanders’ recognition that, in order to stave off “global warming—the greatest threat facing humanity,” we must “keep the vast bulk of the world’s fossil fuels in the ground,” Merkley writes that “Bernie is a determined leader.”
“It is time to recommit ourselves to that vision of a country that measures our nation’s success not at the boardroom table, but at kitchen tables across America,” Merkley concludes. “Bernie Sanders stands for that America, and so I stand with Bernie Sanders for president.”
Speaking on MSNBC‘s “Morning Joe” on Wednesday, Merkley said that he’s optimistic that Sanders will be able to win the Oregon primary on May 17, during which the Democratic candidates will vie for the state’s 61 pledged delegates.
When asked why he is “swimming against the political tide,” Merkley listed Sanders’ leadership on “issue after issue,” and declared “this really is all about the person who has the boldest and most fierce vision on the biggest issues facing America and the world.”
The key endorsement comes less than a week before Sanders and Clinton face off in the April 19th New York primary.
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Protesters who had blocked the road outside one of the world’s largest arms fairs were cleared of charges on Friday, with the judge finding “credible and largely unchallenged evidence” of wrongdoing at the weapons expo.
In mid-September while the DSEI (Defence Security Equipment International) was underway in London, the five men and three women were charged with wilful obstruction of a highway for attempting to stop delivery of equipment to the arms fair.
Click Here: los jaguares argentina
“They said they had acted to stop the sale of weapons to regimes accused of human rights abuses, including Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Israel,” the Guardian reports.
A statement released in November 2015 by the protesters reads, in part, “Whilst outside the Excel Centre we were being detained and arrested by police, inside businessmen prepared to sell weapons designed to torture, maim and kill, for corporate profit.” They added, “we invite you to question why it is us—and not the war makers and profiteers —that are on trial.”
As the Independent reported, “District Judge Angus Hamilton accepted the defendants’ argument that they had tried to prevent a greater crime from occurring by blocking a road to stop tanks and other armored vehicles from arriving at the exhibition center.”
“[There is] clear, credible and largely unchallenged evidence from the expert witnesses of wrongdoing at DSEI and compelling evidence that it took place in 2015,” the Independent reports Hamilton as saying.
“It was not appropriately investigated by the authorities. This could be inferred from the responses of the police officers, that they did not take the defendants’ allegations seriously.”
IBTimes UK adds:
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Following the ruling at the Stratford Magistrates Court, CAAT posted a statement by the protesters, which reads:
DSEI boasts on its website that it “has attracted an unprecedented level of UK Government support,” and offers “Unrivalled business opportunities with over 32,000 attendees.” CAAT, meanwhile, was in 2012 awarded the Right Livelihood Award, also known as the Alternative Nobel Prize, with the award organization saying CAAT “has exposed the corruption, hypocrisy and lethal consequences around this trade and has been instrumental in holding the UK government and arms companies to account for the same.”
The protesters’ supporters took to Twitter to welcome the acquittal:
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Anti-choice groups are using smartphone location tracking technology known as geofencing to target women seeking abortions with advertisements intended to mislead and intimidate, a new investigation by Rewire has revealed.
It’s a tactic that presents serious threats to women’s safety and privacy, as well as that of abortion providers and their staff—particularly as the technology allows anti-choice activists to target those they think will be most susceptible to their message.
“Far too many women already know the fear and intimidation of walking past protesters who are shouting and holding graphic posters outside an abortion clinic,” said Rewire‘s vice president of investigations and research Sharona Coutts, who authored the piece.
“This technology could provide those same protesters the opportunity to push their messages directly into women’s phones. It could even represent a physical threat, as once anti-choice organizations have a woman’s unique phone information, they can sell it to others, or use it to learn her name and address,” Coutts said.
The pioneer of the technology is marketing executive John Flynn, CEO of Copley Advertising, who developed the idea of using geofencing to target abortion seekers with anti-choice propaganda and pitched the plan to the pregnancy crisis center network RealOptions and the country’s largest evangelical adoption group, Bethany Christian Services.
Both organizations now use the technology, which allows them to send propaganda to women’s phones while they are in clinic waiting rooms.
Due to inadequate privacy laws in the U.S., these methods are legal. Rewire reports:
Meanwhile, agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have no jurisdiction over nonprofits, while laws concerning user consent for apps that want to access their data and location are not enough to protect consumers. The only rule is that companies don’t lie about what information they are collecting—even if the truth is buried in the fine print, Rewire writes.
Cooper Quintin, a technologist at the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation, told Rewire that “the way we need to fight back against this is by blocking these things that are tracking who we are and where we are and what we’re looking at.”
“Tracking people and building up these databases of what they read online, where they go in the real world, linking their online behaviors to their offline purchases and real world behavior—these things can have real-world effects,” Quintin said, “and this is a horrific example of how this can affect people in a way that’s much more important than seeing some annoying or creepy ads that follow you around.”
Click Here: Putters
Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
Red Bull motorsport consultant Dr Helmut Marko has said that he and team owner Dietrich Mateschitz had been aware about Honda’s intention to leave Formula 1 at the end of 2021 “for a long time”.
The Japanese manufacturer announced its decision this week, meaning that Red Bull and the sister AlphaTauri team will be without a supplier of power units after the end of next season.
But Marko said that the move had come as no surprise to him. “We work in all directions, because we knew about Honda’s decision for a long time,” he told Speedweek.com this week in an exclusive interview.
- Read also: Renault will supply engines to Red Bull – if forced to act
Asked for more detail on how long he had known, Marko replied: “Longer. During the current season.”
His comments suggested that team boss Christian Horner had not been in the loop on the decision. Horner had previously stated that he had been actively working to keep Honda on board and in the sport.
“Mr Horner is a team principal, but not involved in strategic matters,” Marko stated. “Mr Mateschitz and I have known for a long time.”
With the news now publicly confirmed, the team is having to look for a replacement engine supplier for 2022. One option is that Red Bull and AlphaTauri will return to the Renault fold, but Marko said that other possibilities will also be considered.
“All options will be sorted and then Red Bull will decide what happens,” he confirmed. “I repeat: we sort, present a concept, then a decision will be made. We will research all possibilities.”
Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina
With Red Bull having recently signed the latest Concorde agreement committing the team to another five years in F1, Marko has previously insisted that they have no plans to leave F1.
But in his latest interview, Marko pointed out that signing the agreement did not mean that Red Bull was bound to remain in the sport until 2025.
“We can cancel the contract annually, there is an option to exit at the end of each year,” he said. “But this is not our priority.
“When we have the facts together, Mr Mateschitz will decide,” Marko added, saying that it was the intention to have a plan in place by the end of this year. “Everything will be sorted. If we have results, we’ll see.”
In the meantime, Marko confirmed that the team currently intended to stick with its existing driver line-up, and not swoop on free agents such as Sergio Perez and Nico Hulkenberg.
“If Alex Albon performs well then he stays. If not, there will be deliberation. We would then see which drivers that are good are on the market. But that’s not an issue at the moment.”
Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers
Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter
Argentina defender Juan Foyth has signed a new deal at Tottenham before joining LaLiga outfit Villarreal for the rest of the season.
Foyth moved to north London from Estudiantes in August 2017 and has gone on to make 32 appearances in all competitions for Spurs, but opportunities in recent months have been limited for the 22-year-old.
He has not featured at all since December last year and will now head to Spain in search of regular playing time.
Man United v Tottenham: One big game, five big questions
However, Foyth, capped 10 times by Argentina, has put pen to paper on a 12-month contract extension at Spurs that runs until 2023.
Click Here: camisetas de futbol baratas
A Tottenham statement said: “Juan Foyth has signed a new contract with the club until 2023 and joined Spanish side Villarreal on loan for the remainder of the 2020-21 season.”